Australian Public School Information – Page 2 – All you need to know about Australian Public School, including catchment/zone/boundary information.

The Different Reasons Men And Women Become Teachers

Published by:

There is a pretty interesting article on SMH The Different Reasons Men And Women Become Teachers which I read yesterday. I did a quick summarization of the article with the import point as following

While the “intrinsic” value of teaching and the ability to teach are the top reasons both men and women go into the profession, a new study has found that men are also very likely to go into teaching because they are interested in a particular subject.

This is the third biggest reason male teachers enter the profession, while shaping children’s future and making a social contribution are the third largest motivators for female teachers, according to the survey of more than 1000 teachers.

Other motivators for both male and female teachers include prior teaching and learning experiences and job security.

About 59 per cent of male teachers and 64 per cent of female teachers see teaching as a lifelong career, the study found.

More than 22 per cent of men see classroom teaching as a step towards leadership roles in schools, 6.8 per cent see it as a temporary career until they move into another field and 5.1 per cent see it as a fallback career.

About 17.6 per cent of female teachers see it as a step towards leadership roles, 5.5 per cent see it as a step towards a different role in a related field and 4.2 per cent see it as a fallback career.

Only one in four teachers across the country are male and the proportion of men in the profession has been steadily falling since 1984.

I think one of the most important things to investigate and remediate is why we have such an imbalance between the number of male and female teachers. Taking steps in remediating the issue, this will help in addressing the issue of shortage in teachers in some areas, particularly in the science subjects were traditionally dominated by male.

Share this post:

Student Data Privacy In Australia

Published by:

There is an article on SMH The privacy of our school students is up for grabs, this is actually a very interesting one and deserve more attention from us. I dabble in this field a little bit and understand there are almost limitless applications plus ways to use the data. This issue is not just limited to this, everything we use on a day to day base has this exact same issue, such as Facebook, Google and Apple just to mention a few, it is without a doubt they all collect a vast amount of data regarding us. Even if it is supposed to be anonymous, in reality when you have enough data it is straightforward to identify someone without too much issue.

There is unlimited potential with the data collected, collated and analysed from our students. However as have been amply identified previous, proper safeguard needs to be put in to ensure the data is used properly and only for the purpose described. One of the issues is that the decision makers in our society often are older which is the norm and have a lack of understanding of the potential benefits and pitfalls that new technologies will bring.

Technological advances have enabled large amounts of data to be gathered, collated and analysed from more sources more quickly. The National Schools Interoperability Program endorsed by state and education ministers, and developed under them, along with input from the ed-technology providers, seeks to ensure the standardisation of all software and data across all Australian schools and schooling systems.

Data systems require high levels of technical and statistical expertise. These functions appear to be outsourced to commercial entities and edu-businesses.

This matter needs to be at the forefront of policy debates in education. In our view, legislative protection is necessary. In Japan, for example, privacy legislation has been passed that ensures data can only be used for the explicit purposes for which it was collected. This prohibits the matching of multiple data sources to create algorithms to frame school systems, their policies and the practices of schools. There are also strict procedures for the wiping of data, when it is in the hands of edu-businesses. Such a legislative approach needs to be considered in Australia.

The authors of this article got it spot on, there needs to be legislative protection put into place for the safety and use of these data. It is just way too important not to take this approach.

Share this post:

Parents Shopping For “Good” Public Schools For Their Children

Published by:

As usual, I was just reading the news and this article Shopping for ‘good’ public schools in NSW reinforcing equity gap: research on news.com.au got me interested. I took a few parts and you can read them if you do not want to wade through the original article.

The most sought-after public high schools and their strict catchments are creating a worsening cycle of segregation, effectively locking out poor students and giving wealthy families almost exclusive access to their “better” local schools, research reveals.

The paper found there was a “rather straightforward link between the affluence of a community and the desirability of a community’s school”.

The proposed the solution is

The paper suggests that schools should make at least 10 per cent of places available to students from outside the schools’ immediate catchment areas.

Dr Rowe said: “As part of this, we need to implement blind selection processes for a proportion of places available in a school, rather than competitive access based on testing, academic or sporting merit”.

While I do not dispute the fact that schools in the more affluent area are more desirable. This is a chicken and egg scenario where because the area is more affluent and desirable to live which attracted more affluent families this, in turn, leads to more desirable local public school due better resourced, educated and similarly minded parents. The link and reference to the article that parents are in fact shopping for peers rather than shopping schools are very true indeed. You can put this same bunch of parents with their children to any public school and they will excel. If the parents are shopping for schools will likely mean they will pay attention and invest in more resource in their children’s education. Given 10 percent spots to out of catchment will do exactly nothing to address the issue as applications are likely parents who are seeking quality education for their children and willing to invest time plus money into it.

Also, enrolment in NSW is fairly reasonable, you do not have to own and live in the catchment to be able to be accepted. You could simply be renting in the catchment and still guaranteed a position. I do know many parents specifically rent in the catchment of top ranking public schools to guarantee the enrolment for their children. Access to top ranked public schools are less to do with the affluence of the family but more of the willingness and drive of the parents to do so. Public education is Australia is still affordable to all families and what you get out of it is depend on what you willing to invest in terms of money and effort.

Share this post:

Update For Upgrade For Artarmon Public School

Published by:

I was in the neighbouring area on the weekend, so paid a quick visit and to have a look at how is the upgrade going. By the look of things the upgrade is going up pretty quickly and looks good, look like it will be completed on schedule by the look of it. This is very good for Artarmon Public School because it is one of the most congested schools in the North Shore area. I took a couple of photos and they are as following.

 

Share this post:

Can States Come Up With The Fund Required By Gonski 2.0 Funding?

Published by:

Australia has probably one of the most unusual school funding distribution unlike almost any other country in the world. First, you have three different funding source, Federal, State and private channel. Second we also fairly unique that Australia has one of the highest levels of students educated in private sector. The third is that very significant portion of the funding for private schools is derived from Public sources.

Let’s break that down further, State governments in Australia are largely responsible for the majority of the funding for public schools, State governments funding of private schools are minuscule and can be largely discounted. What is more interesting is that most of the Federal government funding model since Howard years particularly looks to be more interested in funding private schools. There are a lot of historical and ideological reason how this came to be, it is not a surprise that the term “Private School With Public Funding” that was circulating everywhere these days.

Even with the new recent passed Gonski 2.0 funding, the Federal government will fund public schools to 20 percent of their SRS which is short for Schooling Resource Standard entitlement and 80 percent of private school SRS entitlement. This is an interesting point to think of.

Also, the funding model requires the States to fund up to 75 percent of the SRS requirement, originally 80 percent before it was reduced during the passage of the bill. This will require most of the States to come up a fair number of additional funding or otherwise endanger their portion of Federal funding. I personally this is terrible, traditionally States are responsible for Education and this should be better consulted and worked with all States to achieve a more suitable and agreeable outcome.

While I think there are positive aspects of the bill, there are also some core issues yet to be resolved and improved upon.

Share this post:

More Detail On How the New Australian School Funding Will Work

Published by:

More details on how the new school funding will work taken from the news.com.au article Here’s how Gonski 2.0 works for schools. In general, I think this is good particularly with the establishment of an independent National School Resourcing Board, this is an important thing to do to have a long-term continuing neutral approach to school funding.

  • THE GONSKI 2.0 PLAN FOR SCHOOLS FUNDING
    * Still calculates schools funding with a base per-student amount (known as SRS) plus loadings to compensate for poorer, disabled, non-English speaking and indigenous students and schools that are small or remote.
    * The per student base amount in 2018 will be $10,576 for primary students and $13,290 for secondary school students.
    * Those amounts will be indexed at 3.56 per cent a year through to 2020, and move to a floating indexation based on inflation and wage increases from 2021 (with a minimum increase each year of 3 percent).
    * Government funding to private schools takes into account a measure of parental capacity to pay. How that’s calculated will be reviewed and may change in 2019. In the meantime, $46 million in transition funds will be available to Catholic and independent schools in 2018.
    * The Commonwealth share of funding will move to 20 per cent of SRS for public schools and 80 percent for private schools – more than its average share now and in line with historical arrangements.
    * Schools below the SRS will move up over six years and schools above SRS will move down over 10 years.
    * Total Commonwealth school funding will increase by $23.5 billion over the next decade
    * State and territory governments are expected to make up the rest (ie 80 percent for public schools and 20 percent for private). Late changes to the legislation lock in regular increases to make sure states reach these required amounts over the next six years or at the very least don’t cut funding.
    * An independent National School Resourcing Board will be established to keep an eye on how the states and other school authorities distribute funds to schools and review funding levels and other matters, including how parental capacity to pay is calculated. This board will cost $7.2 million over four years.
    * Businessman David Gonski, who led the 2011 review of school funding, has agreed to head a new review of the most effective ways to spend money to improve student achievement.

I am looking forward to the review of the new Schooling Resource Standard (SRS) funding model and get more detail on how this works.

Share this post:

LNP Government Likely To Have Secured Numbers In Senate To Pass The New School Funding “Gonski 2.0” Model Into Law

Published by:

The original article Gonski 2.0 victory: Government secures numbers to pass new funding model into law is on the SMH, you can follow the link the get the full detail if you want. Overall there is relatively change happened to the original proposal and real life politics means often compromises has to be made, so having some like delay to the cut to the funding to the Catholic sector is not unexpected. I am a supporter and proponent of public education and I agree the changes are due in how the schools are funded, a more uniform and properly carried funding would benefit Australian children in years to come.

I am not privy to the exact details, just looking at what is in the news it is a big step towards the right direction which is why I guess LNP managed to secure the support of almost every single one of the crossbench senators to get this to pass. This is in sharp contrast to many of other vindictive policies of recent LNP ideologically driven policies, this is one is a sharp improvement is done right.

There are some lingering questions in my mind such as equality of the funding, such as that some top private schools can charge 20k to 30k per student already and still receive significant government funding. This also projected to grow by a large percentage of some schools which do not really make a lot of sense to me, would not the money be better off spending on schools that need it more and building new ones to better cope with the growing populations.

The key I guess is the following which if done right can set the Australian education funding on the right path for the decades to come.

The government agreed to major concessions to win support for its package, including moving schools to their target funding levels within six years instead of a decade.

The speedier timeline adds $4.9 billion to the $18.6 billion in extra spending over a decade the government had already announced.

It is estimated that $3.3 billion of the new spending secured by the crossbench will flow to public schools.

The government will also introduce new rules forcing state governments to increase their school spending and will create an independent schools resourcing body as recommended by the Gonski report.

It has also agreed to one-year transition arrangements, costing $50 million, for the Catholic sector and other independent school systems and a review of the socio-economic status formula underlying the funding model.

From the above points, the most important is actually establishment of an independent school resourcing body and review of the socio-economic status formula underlying the funding model. Please please do it and get it right.

Share this post:

Does People Live In The Apartments Have Kids?

Published by:

Just came across this article Assumption that ‘people in units don’t have children’ has led to chronic schools shortage in NSW on news.com.au. There are some known and well interesting tidbits coming out of it.

The government has previously said that by 2031 an additional 164,000 public school places will need to be created in order to meet growing demand. This extra money, which will be handed down during Tuesday night’s state budget, will only fund an extra 32,000 places.

Mr Stokes said NSW’s severe lack of schools was due to the growth of “inner and middle ring” suburban locations, which is a “sleeper issue which was not properly planned for historically.”

“What I meant by that, is there was an assumption by demographers historically that people who live in units don’t have children, and as a result there was an insufficient planning,” Mr Stokes said.

“So a lot of that investment is going to be required in inner, middle ring suburbs of Sydney that 10 or 20 years were thought to be very well served, like Penthurst, places around Ryde … areas that we have to retrofit new schools and we have to be innovative about that because we don’t have the land resources in those locations that we have in other areas,” he said.

I have done some previous discussion on this issue. Guess what why the inner cities got no space for new schools, it is because of the successive State government’s failure to plan for the future and sold off a large number of inner city school sites. Those sites will not be able to satisfy the projected demand but will go hell lot long way towards that goal. In the recent years’ Australian politics at both State and Federal level progressively become more and more short term thinking, anything not happening outside next few years just gets ignored and simply pass the buck to the future governments.

Share this post:

NSW Year 12 Completion Rate from 2002 to 2015

Published by:

I found both sets of original data from NSW Department of Education website and meshed them together myself for year 12 completion rate from 2002 to 2015. They are as following, after stalling in high 60th for until 2010, by 2015 NSW has hit high of 72 percent year 12 completion rate.

Locality and gender (%)20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015
Metropolitan Male6465666565656465686970707171
Metropolitan Female7272747473747474767978787978
Metropolitan total6869706969696969727474747574
Provoincial Male5557565453545254565958565961
Provincial Female7171697069696869707472717272
Provincial total6263626160616061636665646566
Remote Male6057535350585255545355636054
Remote Female9173818183788274727776857778
Remote total7464666666686664626465746866
Very Remote Male5650435663435464543252645751
Very Remote Female6366596486797750555657765858
Very Remote total5957516074616557554455706255
All areas Male6163636262626162656767676868
All areas Female7272737372737273757877777777
All areas total6667686767676767707272727372

One must wonder what prompted 5 percent higher completion rate in just a handful of years in NSW. One reason I guess would be the difficulties of securing a job for the young people and prompted more people staying at school for longer these days. This looks like coincide with the start of GFC in 2008 and end with a spike in completion rate in 2010.

Also the requirement of higher language and technical skills for the jobs these days must also be of a factor but that I think this factor must be a gradual process not as dramatic as this.

Share this post:

 

Cecil Hills High School

Published by:

This is the school catchment map for Cecil Hills High School in Sydney, NSW.

The full map which you will need to zoom down or use the search function to find the school you want to look at.

The most common name used by NSW Department of Education is called “catchment” which refer to that students resides in particular area are guaranteed a position in specific schools. When discussed from the perspective of a particular school is often referred as one of the following terms.

  • School Zone
  • School intake area
  • School catchment

As the usual contact, the school in question or Department of Education for the final confirmation and you can also access the full High School Catchment Map by following this link.

Share this post: